RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03492
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending
31 Jan 14 be corrected to show that the acronym OCO denotes
Offensive Cyber Operations instead of Overseas Contingency
Operations.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His OPR references OCO twice and in both instances are
intended to be related to offensive cyber activities and not
overseas operations.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of major (O-4).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. The applicant has not exhausted
all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking
correction of his military records.
The AFBCMR is the highest level of administrative appeal within
the Department of the Air Force. Under the provisions of AFI
36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, the
AFBCMR will not consider a case until all avenues of
administrative relief have been exhausted. DPSID recommends the
applicant submit an AF Form 948, Application for
Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, with all required
supporting documentation as required by AFI 36-2406, Officer and
Enlisted Evaluation Systems, through the virtual Military
Personnel Flight (vMPF) Evaluation Appeals found under the Most
Popular Applications. If the administrative appeal is not
successful, the applicant may resubmit his DD Form 149,
Application for Correction of Military Records Under the
Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552, and the results
of the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) to the AFBCMR.
A complete copy of the DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 Mar 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this
respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level
of appeal within the Air Force. As such, an applicant must
first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief
provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief
before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force
Instruction. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has
reviewed this application and indicated there is an available
avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first
pursued. In view of this, we find this application is not ripe
for adjudication at this level as there exists a subordinate
level of appeal that has not first been depleted. Therefore, in
view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all
available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting
his application to the AFBCMR; and the application will only be
reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of
administrative relief.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03492 in Executive Session on 10 Jun 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Aug 14, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 Mar 15.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His referral Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period of 8 Jul 2008 through 23 Feb 2009, be voided from his officer selection record (OSR), or alternatively, the push line (part IV, line 6) of the OPR in question be redacted. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02854
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) First Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC) be corrected to read Air Force Achievement Medal (Basic Award) and the spelling of his last name within the citation be corrected. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00400
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00400 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The close out date on his Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be corrected from 10 May 10 to 1 Apr 10 to align with the arrival at his new duty station. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period of 21 Jun 12 through 20 Jun 13, be voided or removed from his military personnel records. In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, chapter 10, paragraph 10.1.1: The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04456
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. This award is an award of a foreign government, which must be officially accepted in order for it to be recorded in a members official...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04955
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief by not first filing an appeal of her OPR through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00661
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00661 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), Second Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (2BOLC) on 11 Jul 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01687
In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, chapter 10, paragraph 10.1.1: The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was established to provide all Air Force personnel with an avenue of relief for correcting errors or injustices in evaluations at the lowest possible level. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05449
Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period ending 21 Mar 12 be removed from her record. Her EPR for the period ending 2 Feb 13 be removed from her record. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The EPR for the period ending 21 Mar 12 includes a negative comment stating she received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR); however this LOR is not in her Personal Information File (PIF) nor is there any evidence of it in her records.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05389
Furthermore, the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal...